1997 (4) TMI 292
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Talajia, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.N. Srinivasan, Member (J)]. - These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the captioned order wherein the Commissioner of Central Excise had confirmed the demand of Rs. 75,23,185/- as duty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. He has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 11,11,202/- under Secti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ived in advance. In effect they would like to follow the decision of the Madras High Court in Lakshmi Machines Works reported in 1995 (77) E.L.T. 799 (Mad.). They also invited our attention to the recent judgment of the Tribunal in Flex Industries Ltd. v. C.C.E., Meerut [1997 (91) E.L.T. 120 (Tribunal) = 1997 (19) RLT 365] and the decision of the South Regional Bench in the case of MIL Controls Lt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sold which may affect the assessable value under the Central Excise Act. We are of the view that following the judgments of the Tribunal in the said two cases, namely Flex Industries Ltd. v. C.C.E. and MIL Control Ltd. (supra) the impugned order cannot be sustained. 5. The ld. Departmental Representative cited the case of Resistence Alloy Industries v. C.C.E. - 1995 (77) E.L.T. 725. Howeve....
TaxTMI