Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1997 (1) TMI 349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Appellant cleared a consignment on payment of duty. Goods were subsequently returned to it as they were not accepted by the buyer. Appellant reprocessed them in terms of the permission obtained under Rule 173L and exported them without payment of duty. Its claim for refund of duty paid when the goods were first cleared was rejected on the ground that rule ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....173L which otherwise appear to overlap some extent. Now, Rule 173L is not a charging section. That is Rule 9. Rule 173L only provides a relaxation or concession to the manufacturer to the extent that when the same goods come back for reprocessing amounting to manufacture and therefore are liable to pay the duty again, the duty paid initially can be refunded. Therefore, the restriction that the amo....