1999 (6) TMI 77

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Jain, Vice President]. - Matter called. None for the respondents. 2. Question involved in this appeal of Revenue is that whether the value of goods affixed with the brand name of another person who is not entitled to the benefit of Notification 175/86-C.E. and these being cleared on payment of duty in terms of para 7 of the said notification should be taken into account in computing the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cope of the notification itself. Therefore question of reckoning the same for computing the clearances under Clause (a) & (b) of para 1 of the notification does not arise. Revenue's reliance on Tribunal's judgment of East Zone Bench in the case of C.C.E. v. India Portteries Limited reported in [1993 (67) E.L.T. 294 (Tribunal)] is a misapplication of that judgment to the facts and circumstances of ....