Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1998 (3) TMI 436

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. - Appeal E/2652/89-A is directed against Order-in-Original No. 41/88, dated 1-12-1988 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-I. The other three appeals are directed against Order-in-Original No. 91/91, dated 5-11-1990 also passed by the Additional Collector, Central Excise, Bombay. 2. M/s. Sadhna Textile....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Additional Collector passed Order No. 41/88 confirming the demand proposed on the two processors and imposing penalty on each of the concerns referred to above. M/s. Rainbow Textiles challenged this order before the High Court of Bombay. Department agreed before the High Court to withdraw the impugned order and assured that fresh personal hearing will be granted to the writ petitioner. Accordingl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....drawn. Proceedings before the High Court clearly indicated that the Additional Collector must pass a fresh order after fresh personal hearing. Such an order must conform to the requirements of  an order such as specific confirmation or otherwise of demand and specific confirmation or otherwise of imposition of penalty. There is a serious defect in the second order. Ujagar Print's clarificator....