Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (4) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Shri Gurdeep Singh, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T)]. - The issue relates to denial of capital goods, Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules amounting to Rs. 26,99,123.80, which has been demanded  under provisions to Rule 57U of the Central Excise Rules from the appellants. The materials on which capital goods Modva....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r  machinery used for processing materials; (7) Emrom, cards/driver cards : These are microprocessors used in different equipments which assist in smooth control over the operations of plant; (8) Control panels : These are used to supply and control power supply to  furnaces and different machines in the plant. 2. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t used for producing or processing of any goods directly. 3. Shri Gautam Doshi, the ld. Chartered Accountant appearing for the appellants submitted that there are Tribunal's decisions in respect of most of the materials who held that they are eligible for capital goods Modvat credit under Rule 57Q and he cited the same. 4. Shri Gurdeep Singh, the ld. DR for the department, contende....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amendment, then the entitlement should not be taken away merely because the machinery was not referred to by the specific nomenclature. The Tribunal held that crane which was used for bringing together various parts of assembly would definitely permit to be used in the production of processing of the final goods. 6. In the case of Collector of Central Excise v. Nova Udyog Ltd. - 1996 (88) ....