Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (4) TMI 175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....This appeal relates to imposition of penalty of Rs. 25,000.00 and duty demand of Rs. 7,081 plus cess of Rs. 186.00. The charge in the show cause notice was that the appellant had removed two consignments twice under same invoice numbers, namely, invoice Nos. 117 and 118, dated 2-7-1995. 2. Arguing the case for admission, learned Counsel, Shri Alok Arora submits that the only evidence in supp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....admitted position that United Packaging had stated that they did not receive the goods. Shri Arora submits that in the absence of any evidence relating to clandestine production and sale, demand of duty and imposition of heavy penalty are not justified at all. The only omission is that of not cancelling the invoices prepared in the name of United Packaging as the supply did not take place. 3.&ems....