1998 (11) TMI 199

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mayur Shroff, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri A. Ashokan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - These five appeals arise out of two orders of Commissioner (Appeals). Since these have a common issue and relate to the same assessee they are being disposed of in this single order. 2. The common issue in all these 5 appeals is the eligibility as input....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... We observe that there are number of judgments where the Tribunal has held that when comparing the description of the inputs in the declaration and in the documents covering the inputs a certain degree of leniency has to be shown. In this regard Tribunal has observed that broad description should suffice. Thus where proper wires and rods were declared as inputs, aluminium bronze rods were ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... held as permissible. 5. In the present case we find that the rejected final goods received back and the inputs fall under the same tariff sub-heading. The difference between the terms `resin' and `plastics' cannot be held to be fatal to the entitlement of the assessees. 6. At this stage we take cognizance of the submissions made by the learned DR. He submits that in terms of the d....