Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (6) TMI 193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... amount was adjusted as due from them by the Asstt. Commissioner of Customs, NOIDA Export Processing Zone vide his letter dated 11-4-1996 which on appeal by the applicant was upheld by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi leading to the present appeal and the connected Stay Application. 2.  It was stated by Shri G. Shiva Dass, learned Counsel for the applicant that their Unit is engaged in the manufacture of Compact Discs for which they had made necessary applications to the Development Commissioner, NEPZ vide their letter dated 24-8-1988. In response to their application the Government granted them necessary permissions for the manufacture of the product in question. It was explained by the learned Counsel that the proc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....given them similar benefit treating the same activity of packing in Jewel Boxes of Compact Discs as amounting to manufacture. 3.  Resisting submissions of the learned Counsel, Shri M. Ali, Departmental Representative stated the Order passed by the Jurisdictional Commissioner cited in support of the Appeal involved a different factual situation and a different Notification. That was not a case of removal of the packed CDs to DTA. He referred to the detailed discussions contained in the Impugned Order-in-Appeal and referred to the decisions of various High Courts and Tribunals considered by the Commissioner (Appeals). He then referred to the Supreme Court decision in the case of M/s. Novopan India Limited [1994 (73) E.L.T. 769 (S.C.)]....