TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1998 (4) TMI 211
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....K. Srivastava, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K. Sankararaman, Member (T)]. - The appeal challenges the order passed by Additional Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh demanding Central Excise duty of Rs. 2,000/- from appellant on the ground that appellant had evaded duty on television sets by misdeclaring the cost of their manufacture as Rs. 4,950/-. By so declaring the cost....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....declared the price of Rs. 4,950/- per set in the price list filed by them which have been approved by the Assistant Collector. When price under Section 4(1)(a) is available, resort to provisions of valuation rules is not called for, and, accordingly, the exercise of costing resorted to by the department is unwarranted. 3. Resisting the arguments of the learned Counsel, Shri K. Srivastava, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hat case also the dispute related to the proper costing of TV sets to decide whether their price was more than Rs. 5,000/- or not. The department had added certain elements like the cost of advertising, sales promotion activity incentives etc. and on that basis the cost of Television set exceeded Rupees five thousand. On merits it was held by the Tribunal that these amounts cannot be included in a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... department could not have enhanced the assessable value. 5. The above reasoning would clearly apply to the present case though the department in the present case had not accepted the declared cost of the components unlike in the case cited. All the same, there is no case made out that the appellant received a higher price than what had been declared in the price list or shown in the invoi....