1998 (3) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The captioned appeal is against disallowing Modvat credit amounting to Rs. 1,02,133.70 and imposition of penalty of Rs. 40,000/-. 2. In the impugned Order, it has been held that the Appellants had received certain items in their factory before 16-3-1995 and took credit on them in RG 23C Part II on 31-3-1995. It has been stated that Rule 57....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ncerned, the fact remains that these goods were received in the appellant's factory and were used for manufacture/processing of the final product and, therefore, Modvat credit would be eligible to them. 5. Opposing the contention of the Appellants, Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, the ld. JDR, submitted that there was prohibition for taking Modvat credit on such goods before 16-3-1995 and, therefo....