Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (8) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The following question, purported to be a question of law has been raised by the appellant-Commissioner in the subject Reference Application :- "whether the Hon'ble CEGAT, EB is correct in dismissing an Appeal considering the same as infructuous without going into the merits of the case." 2. Before dealing with the question, it is appropriate ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondents filed an appeal against the imposition of penalty of Rs. 2,000/- before the lower appellate authority. Simultaneously, Revenue also filed an appeal by way of application under Section 35E against the order of the Assistant Collector dropping the demand of duty. 1.4 The lower appellate authority set aside the impugned order of penalty against the respondents in their appeal. He, h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Order-in-Original passed by the Assistant Collector has since been dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide his Order-in-Appeal No. 85-RA-Cal. II/96, dated 10-7-1996. 4. It is in the aforesaid circumstances the Tribunal found that in view of the ground taken by the Commissioner in its Appeal before the Tribunal against setting aside of penalty of Rs. 2,000/- by the lower appellate au....