1998 (1) TMI 140

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../Shri P.K. Dutta and Biswajit Mukherjee, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. -  Briefly stated, facts of the case are as follows :- 1.1 The appellant herein is, inter alia, manufacturing Calcined Petroleum Coke (CPC) out of Raw Petroleum Coke (RPC) arising in their Refinery Division at Barauni. RPC is then taken through conveyer belt to their coke....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... are brought from outside from some other factories. Therefore, a demand for the period January, 1977 to March, 1980 was proposed in the said show cause notice for recovery of an amount to the tune of Rs. 2,68,31,335.67. The show cause notice further alleged that by taking proforma credit on RPC of their own manufacturer, the appellant also took an unintended benefit of Rs. 68,97,874.34 which was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....actured in the manufacturer's factory.' Ld. Manager, Shri Banerjee, therefore, submits that in view of this Explanation which is clearly of a clarificatory nature, the benefit of proforma credit on inputs (namely, RPC here) manufactured by the appellant in their own refinery plant even it is assumed to be so, would be available for utilisation thereof in the manufacture of CPC by virtue of the ....