Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (6) TMI 99

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. - Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of footwear filed two price lists 14/986 and 22/86 declaring prices of footwear and also claiming deduction of trade discount at 12% per annum. The prices lists were approved and clearances were made on payment of appropriate duty. It was subsequently found that appellant was paying....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. 3. Thus, we see that the reasoning of the two lower authorities was divergent. The reasoning of the Assistant Collector was that trade discount given was not uniform in all cases. The reasoning of the appellate authority was that the deposit received from buyers had depressed the price. The show cause notice did not make any reference to any deposit received from any buyer or the ....