Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (3) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondents. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - The respondents in this appeal were marketing a product known as "Pacudamix" in gunny bags of 20 kgs. and 80 kgs. containing a mix of gramflour and maize flour in the proportions of either 70:30 or 55:45. A show cause notice was issued alleging that these products were dutiable under Chapter Heading 2107.91 and demanding duty for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd chilly powder were not present in the impugned goods. He observed that the goods were simply mixture of gramflour and maize flour. It was his finding that the mixture did not amount to manufacture and that the product although so advertised as Pacudamix was commonly known only as Besan in the retail market. We find that this logic of his has not been challenged in the Appeal Memorandum. The app....