Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1996 (3) TMI 225

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 140 & 141/93-D, dated 17-8-1993 the appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 5 crores in Appeal No. E/5208/92-D and Rs. 13 crores in A. No. E/5233/92-D in cash and to furnish the Bank Guarantee for the balance amount of duty in both the appeals. Against that order of the Tribunal the appellants moved the writ petition being writ petition No. 834/94 before the Delhi High Court and the Court passed the first Order on 3-5-1994 and the Final Order on 26-8-1994 whereby the Court directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 18 crores in cash and furnish the Bank Guarantee in a sum of Rs. 17 crores and also an undertaking to safeguard payment of balance of Rs. 34 crores in both these appeals and time for compliance was extended upto 31-10-1994. Against....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rlier order to safeguard payment of balance of Rs. 34 crores the appeals of GTC E. Ap. 5233/92 and E. Ap. 5208/92 will be entertained by the CEGAT. Time for compliance extended up to 31-10--1994 (2)  If there is default in compliance with clause (1) above, the said two appeals before the CEGAT shall stand dismissed." 3. In reply Shri N.R. Khaitan, Ld. counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants complied with the stay order as modified by the Delhi High Court and Apex Court by making a cash deposit, and furnishing Bank Guarantees and undertakings. He also submitted that as per the terms of the Bank Guarantees the same were enforceable upto 26-4-1996, 30-4-1996, 30-4-1996 and 1-5-1996 and, therefore, according to him ....