Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (3) TMI 233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the demand arises as a differential duty, according to the Department, which is payable under Heading 84.54 on ingot moulds and the differential duty is calculated taking into account the duty already paid by the applicants, herein, on clearance of the goods as scrap under Heading 72.03. The ld. Counsel submitted that the ingot moulds manufactured by them are used in their factory. Over a period of time, these ingot moulds become scrap as part of it also and get melted during the process of manufacture of ingots. The applicants, herein, melted most of the ingot moulds which have become unusable and some quantity was also cleared as scrap. For demanding of duty as scrap, the Department's interpretation is that the ingot moulds, which ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng interpretation of the condition as contained in Notification and in such a view of the matter, the Department cannot allege suppression of the facts by the applicants herein so as to invoke the longer period for demanding duty under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. 3. Shri A.K. Singhal, ld. D.R. opposing the stay, drew attention to the manner in which the applicants have declared their product in their classification list and contended that there is clear suppression of facts by the applicants, herein. The notification wording is clear wherein it is stated that defective moulds which are cleared as such outside the factory will not get the benefit of the notification. He drew the attention to the reasoning of ....