1994 (9) TMI 200
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for the Respondent. [Order]. - This appeal is directed against the order-in-original 42/89, dated 27-10-1989 confirming the demand of Rs. 45,082/- on the molasses lost or destroyed. The demand was raised on the ground that the molasses were stored in kutcha pit and that the appellants had executed a bond for discharging the duty liability irrespective of whether the molasses were lost ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e the permission was granted for destruction without expressly mentioning that it was granted without affecting to the right of the department to make recovery. He submits that besides that, the appellant, while storing the molasses in kutcha pit, had also executed a bond undertaking to discharge the duty liability irrespective of the deterioration or destruction. When such an express undertaking ....
TaxTMI