Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (10) TMI 196

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocates, for the Applicants. Shri K.M. Mondal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. -  For hearing the applicants' appeal on merits, they are required to deposit a sum of Rs. 2,61,86,951 towards duty, as per the order in Appeal No. PCJ/107/1993-BRD, dated 28-7-1993. 2. The issue involved is the eligibility of exemption in respect of ammonia used i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ave, the ld. advocate, pleaded that they have filed the classification list on 20-3-1990, wherein, they have claimed the benefit of not only the Notification No. 40/85 in respect of usage of ammonia in the manufacture of fertilisers but also in respect of ammonia used in the manufacture of melamine. He referred to the relevant classification lists. The classification list filed in March, 1990 was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... available. Now they have changed their stand and claimed benefit of Notification No. 217/86. Even then, the admitted position is that ammonia is used only in the manufacture of molten urea and not in melamine directly. Hence, the benefit of Notification No. 217/86 will not be available. 4. After hearing both the sides, prima facie we feel that the authorities below ought to have considere....