Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1994 (2) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S. Kalyanam, Member (J)]. -  Stay petition - Since the issue to be decided in the appeal is only with reference to leviability of penalty or its quantum, we take up the appeal itself today with the consent of parties and therefore grant waiver of pre-deposit of penalty pending appeal today. 2. Appeal - Shri Sriram Panchu, the learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....artmental officers and therefore, whatever may be the nature of infraction, certainly it would not entail penal consequences and imposition of penalty is not called for and the ld. Advocate made a fervant plea for setting aside the penalty.  3. Shri J.P. Gregory, the learned SDR submitted that procedural infraction is admitted and in the entire MODVAT Scheme, transfer of Credit from one....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in this case has done documentation in manner to suggest as if that the appellant has transferred the inputs from their factory to their sister concern while not stating that transfer in effect took place in proper. The Learned Counsel fairly conceded that the appellant had purchased inputs and had taken MODVAT Credit in respect of the same and utilised the same in their factory for manufacturing ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is course of action when the law did not provide for the same. The appellant's plea is that the appellant informed the Supdt. of Central Excise in whose jurisdiction the sister concern functions about what the appellant was doing. This does not in any way clothe the appellant's action with any legality. It is not clear to us as to under what provisions of law their other Unit can take MODVAT Credi....