Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (5) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JDR, for the Respondents. [Order]. -  Shri A.M. Guha, the ld. Consultant appeared for the appellant and Shri B.D. Bhagat, the ld. JDR for the respondent. 2. Heard the submissions of both sides. The main emphasis of the ld. Consultant appearing for the appellant was that the goods had not reached the RG-1 stage; that they were maintaining pre-RG 1 register incorporating the dail....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Haryana Plywood Industries. Pointing certain parts of the Adjudicating Officer's order as also the order of the Collector (Appeals) the ld. Consultant submitted that there were a number of inaccuracies and some of the points relied upon in those orders had been taken and copied from the statement of Shri Upadhyay which was retracted. He submitted that there is no case made out against the appella....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d goods was valid in law and imposition of penalty was justified in view of the fact that the goods were not recorded in the prescribed Central Excise documents. 4. Heard the submissions of both sides and considered them. On the question whether the goods were fully finished goods or not, the dispute is that according to the appellant a number of processes were to be undergone before they ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned of these semi-finished goods. However, on a pointed query whether the introduction of this register was notified to the Central Excise Authorities as such, the appellant submitted that this register was being maintained by other plywood manufacturers also and as that was the practice of the trade they also maintained it. He also submitted that the pages of the register were verified and a cert....