1993 (9) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri S.K. Sharma, J.D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Member (T)]. - Briefly the facts of the case [are] as follows :- 1.1 The appellants are manufacturers of Solenoid valves and other products. These products were classified under Tariff Item 68 till 28-2-1986 and thereafter under Tariff Heading 8481.80. The appellants are duly registered as SSI factory and had been availing th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....986 are determined by the two Notifications 175/86 and 213/86. The appellants have contended that they were not aware of Notification 213/86 and therefore, did not file a revised classification list on the basis of the Notification 213/86 and they continued to pay duty on the basis of the earlier approved classification list on the basis of Notification 175/86 during the concerned period 25-3-1986....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....section (1) to Section 11A of the CESA, 1944 on the ground that the appellants deliberately did not file the classification list at a higher rate in terms of Notification No. 202/86 read with Notification 213/86 dated [25-3-1986] and therefore, the larger period of five years for demand of duty was invokable. It was the duty of the assessee to observe the provisions of relevant notification under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o be wilful suppression of facts or mis-statement of facts. Department was also aware about the issue of the said notification and suitable directions could be issued to the appellants in that respect. Learned advocate has, therefore, submitted that it is merely a case at best of oversight and no wilfulness can be read into the omission of the appellants. 3. Learned JDR, on the other hand, reiter....