Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (11) TMI 286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was used for manufacture of tablets which was considered as not mentioned in the said exemption notification. The Assistant Collector has passed a one line order rejecting the refund claim on the ground that despite grant of sufficient time, the importer did not produce the requisite document/information and the claim was liable to be rejected as unsubstantiated. 2. However, the Collector (Appeals) has given a detailed order. The Collector has noted that the condition of exemption notification No. 45/79-Cus. is that full exemption can be availed if the goods imported are used in the manufacture of life saving drugs and medicines specified in Notification No. 208/81. He has noted the appellants producing end-use certificate for consumption ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Whereas Notification No. 45/79-Cus. exempts under Sr. No. 9 Refampicin imported as bulk drug from the payment of whole of the customs duty provided it is used in the manufacture of life saving medicines specified in the Notification No. 208/81-Cus. They have submitted that Refampicin appearing in Notification No. 201/81-Cus. includes all forms of formulations including tablets, syrups and injectables. They have further contended that Refampicin is a bulk drug and is used for manufacture of life saving drugs for treatment of Tuberculosis and leprosy and that Refampicin could be used in any form i.e. tablets, syrups, Injectables and capsules and the restrictive meaning given by the Collector that the entry has to be read only for capsules is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rendered in the case of Union of India v. Suksha International and Nutan Gems and Another [1989 (39) E.L.T. 503 SC] wherein it has been held that in the interpretation of statute, the beneficial provisions are not to be read restricting the scope of beneficial provisions. 4. We have heard Shri U.S. Prakasam for the appellants and Shri S. Chakraborti, Departmental Representative for the Revenue. The Government of India issued Notification No. 321/85 dated 17-10-1985. By this Notification, it has amended Notification No. 208/81-Cus., dated 22-9-1981 in the following manner - In the Schedule annexed to the said notification, under heading "A. Life Saving Drugs or medicines", for Item No. 108 and the entry relating thereto, the following item....