2010 (8) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Singh, Advocate for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. Delay in refiling condoned. Heard on merits. 2. This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short "the Act") against the order dated 8.12.2008 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") in Appeal No. E/363/2007-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp;      Whether it could be alleged that the inputs had not been received by the appellants when the Department had not produced any alternative source of supply of inputs which were used in the manufacture of finished goods? (iv)       Whether the Tribunal is right in disallowing the credit to the appellants when there is no evidence what....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of a registered dealer, namely, M/s. Naveen Ispat. The revenue issued a show cause notice to the assessee proposing to deny the credit availed by it on the ground that the octroi record showed the consignee to be some other party at Khanna. The show cause notices were also issued to the registered dealer M/s Naveen Ispat and actual recipient of goods i.e. M/s Shiya Steel co-noticee. The notices w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the revenue, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). Hence the present appeal by the assessee. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 5. The Tribunal while reversing the finding of the Commissioner of Appeals had come to the conclusion that the vehicle in which the alleged goods under the invoice whereupon cenvat credit had been....