2010 (3) TMI 482

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri Sameer Chitkara, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - In this case, the Service tax of Rs. 20,818/- and interest thereon has been demanded from the appellant on the ground that the appellant pro vided security agency services during the year 2003-2004. The penalties under Sections 75A, 76, 77 & 78 of Finance Act, 1994 have also been imposed. 2. Learned Chartered Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3. Learned SDR submits that the Service tax has been correctly demanded since the appellant had registered the firm with Provident Fund department as security agency service arid further the name itself indicates that they are engaged in providing security agency service. Further, he drew my attention to Table VII in the Order-in-Original which shows that the appellant were issuing invoices b....