Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (2) TMI 411

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order of the Tribunal and have heard standing counsel appearing for the assessee and advocate Shri Balakrishnan appearing for the respondent. 3. Clause (ea) of section 2 provides for exemption is as follows: "'assets' in relation to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1993, or any subsequent assessment year, means- (i) any building or land appurtenant thereto (hereinafter referred to as house), whether used for residential or commercial purposes or for the purpose of maintaining a guesthouse or otherwise including a farmhouse situated within twentyfive kilometres from local limits of any municipality (whether known as Municipality, Municipal Corporation or by any other name) or a Cantonment Board, but does not ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ding is leased out on market rate of rent by the assessee to the firm and so much so the building cannot be said to have been used by the assessee for her own business purpose entitling for exemption. So far as the case decided by the CIT (Appeals) is concerned the standing counsel submitted that such decision will not bind the Department. Counsel for the assessee contended that except for the purpose of income-tax the firm is nothing but the partners together and so much so business carried on by the firm should be treated as business carried on by the partner. We are unable to accept this contention because the requirement of the above section for exemption is use of the building for business or profession by the assessee himself. This is....