2010 (1) TMI 217

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....my, for the Petitioner. None, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The prayer in the writ petition is to quash a show cause notice dated 17-9-2009 issued by the first respondent calling upon the petitioner to show cause notice within a period of 30 days as to why service tax should not be demanded for the period from July, 04 to February, 05 under proviso to section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ragraph 3 of the show cause notice, and submitted that the tax has already been quantified which shows that the show cause notice is an empty formality. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner by placing reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Siemens Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others - 2007 (5) S.T.R. 3 (S.C.) = 2007 (207) E.L.T. 168 (S.C.) = (2006) 12 Supreme Court Ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pears to be not tenable for certain reasons. Paragraph 3 and 4 of the show cause notice has set out the reasons based on which the first respondent has stated that the prima facie the contention of the petitioner is not tenable. I find that there is no predetermination of the issue or any foregone conclusion arrived at by the first respondent. In paragraph 5, of the show cause notice the petitione....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -2007 (5) S.T.R. 3 (S.C.) = 2007 (207) E.L.T. 168 (S.C.) = (2006) 12 Supreme Court Cases 33 has no application to the facts of the present case. Further the question whether the extended period could be invoked or not is also a factual question which should be best left to the adjudicating authority to decide based on the reply to be submitted by the petitioner and the documents, if any, to be pr....