2009 (10) TMI 228

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appearing Parties. ORDER 1. Appellant M/s. G. Tech Construction Co. is listed as service provider under the category of "Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services". During the period from 10-9-2004 to 31-3-2007, appellants had provided services to their client and claimed abatement of 67 per cent under the Notification No. 19/2003-ST, dated 21-8-2003, as amended. After issue of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....airly admitted that he has no evidence to show that the Commissioner's observation that liability to pay service tax and interest is not challenged, is wrong. Therefore, the only issue to be decided is liability of the assessee for penalty under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. The appellants have been denied the benefit of Notification No. 19/2003-ST, dated 21-8-2003 on the ground....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is in excess of the amount of service tax calculated on a value which is equivalent on thirty-three per cent of the gross amount charged from the customer under a contract for supplying a plant, machinery or equipment and commissioning or installation of the said plant, machinery or equipment, subject to the following conditions, namely :— (i) the exemption contained in this Notification is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lment of Notification optional. 5. What the Notification implies is that gross amount charged from the customer shall include the value of Plant, Machinery and Equipment, parts and any other material sold by the service provider. I cannot find any basis to interpret the notification to mean that if the service provider has not sold the material to the client but has used them while providing se....