2008 (3) TMI 415

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent. [Judgment (Oral)]. - The appellant was prosecuted for contravention of Section 111(d)(l)(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. He has been acquitted. 2. The prosecution was in respect of the contents of the container imported by the Respondent. He had declared that it contains household goods worth about Rs. 94,000/-. However, when opened it was found to contain the goods worth approximately ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... are clearly admissible in law. Mr. Godinho, the learned Counsel for the respondent has not been able to refute these propositions. 5. A perusal of the judgment clearly supports the contention of the appellant that there is no discussion of the evidence of Investigating Officer. The learned Trial Judge has merely stated "P.W. 5 has investigated the case." in the judgment in para. 11. The learne....