Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (4) TMI 354

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....[Order]. - Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), whereby penalty imposed on the respondent under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002 was set aside. 2. After hearing the ld. DR and on perusal of the records, it is seen that the respondent is the Director of M/s. Sahibabad Chemicals & Fertilizers (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "The Company"). The Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of clandestine removal of the goods by the Company. The respondent herein is the Executive Director of the Company and worked on behalf of the Company and, therefore, penalty is imposable on him. I find that the shortage was detected during stock verification and the Company deposited the duty upon detection of the shortage. The original Authority confirmed the demand of duty and also imposed pen....