TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (7) TMI 447
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Respondent. [Order per: D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Shri S.K. Pahwa, learned Advocate has principal grievance that the appellant had not at all carried out any completion and finishing activity to forgo the abatement granted by law in respect of the materials used in works contracts executed by the appellant. The services carried out by the appellant were alteration and renovocation activ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... constructions, Circular No. 1/2006, dated 1-3-2006 (sic) (Notification No. 1 /2006-S.T.) grants exemption to the extent of 67% in respect of the material to compute the value of taxable service involved in those works. This appellant has legitimate claim for the abatement granted by law. 3. Learned Joint CDR submits that the works executed by the appellant were completion and finishing for which....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... not call for dispensing with pre-deposit. The activities carried out by the Appellant have been found by the authorities as not calling for enjoying abatement. The authority was of the view that services provided was dominant than materials used in the entire activity. He has also analysied in para 36 of the order as to scope of work done. He has found out upon analysis that the appellant is not ....