Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. - In this case 2728 pieces Art silk sarees have been confiscated for not corresponding to the declared description and the value, under the provisions of Section 113(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and since the goods had already been exported and that the exporter had claimed ineligible DEPB credit of Rs. 2,51,644/-, a pena....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f realization of sale proceeds of goods covered by the 3rd Shipping Bill, the first plea, i.e. absence of evidence of contemporary export of identical goods at lower price will cover the goods exported under the 3rd Shipping Bill also. In the light of the above, charge of over invoicing of art silk sarees is set aside as not sustainable. 3. As regards the DEPB claim, we find that the authorities ....