1987 (8) TMI 337

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts. Shri Vineet Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The only issue for determination in this appeal is the correct classification under the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the CET) of six consignments of glass mirrors imported by the appellants. The appellant's claim that the goods fell under Item No. 68 CET was rejected by the l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hen Item No. 23A underwent amendments. The imports covered by the present appeal are also after 1-3-1979. Following the Supreme Court's decision, we hold that the glass mirrors involved in these consignments were also classifiable under Item No. 68 CET. The appeals are allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. 4.  The Registry, it appears, has erroneously asked the appellants to....