Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (4) TMI 299

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ander, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.C. Mandal, Member (T)].  - Learned Advocate has argued that the appellants in this case manufactured synthetic resin for captive consumption as well as Synthetic resin on behalf of M/s. Assam Veneer Co., out of the raw materials supplied by the latter. The goods were assessed provisionally because of dispute in classification and the assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....both sides for deciding this appeal. Admittedly, the classification of the goods and the assessment have not yet been finalised. Penalty of Rs. 25,000/- has been imposed on the appellants under Rule 173-Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. For imposing penalty under this Rule, it is necessary that the goods should be excisable. As the assessment has not yet been finalised, the question of excisabi....