Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (1) TMI 179

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The appellant is a certified goldsmith. On the basis of intelligence, the officers of Headquarters Gold & Customs Preventive Unit, Guntur, intercepted the appellant and other person on 2-8-1985 at about 10.30 a.m. at Vijayawada Railway Station. One Durga Das who was also in the company of the appellant at that time was found in possession of the appellant's brief case which on examination by the authorities was found to contain 873.850 gms. of primary gold as detailed hereunder : S.No. Description Weight Grams Purity Ct. Value Rs. 1. First packet packed in Hindi Daily News Paper containing the gold biscuit having markings "SUISSE 5 TOLAS 999.9 F....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the appellant at the outset submitted that the Show Cause Notice was not served on the appellant before the expiry of six months in terms of Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962, the 'Act' for short and therefore, the impugned order is vitiated. It was further submitted that even though reliance has been placed in regard the purity of the gold and its foreign origin on the Mint authority dated 26-2-1986 against the appellant, a copy of the same was not given to the appellant much less the appellant afforded an opportunity of being heard in that regard. The impugned order was, therefore, assailed as violative of the principles of natural justice. 4. Heard Shri C.V. Krishnan, the learned D.R. 5. Regarding the first point we do not fi....