Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1983 (12) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Gaffar, 10/2, Watgunge Street, Calcutta-23, being aggrieved from Order No. Cal-Cus-3213/82, dated 11-11-1982 passed by the Collector (Appeals), Calcutta, filed an appeal before this Tribunal. The said appeal was presented in the Registry on the 21st day of February, 1983 in the form of letter and was not on proper form. The Registry had intimated the defect to the appellant vide Letter No. CD(T)Ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 and personal penalty of Rs. 250/- was also levied on the appellant. 3.  Being aggrieved from the aforesaid order, the appellant had filed the appeal before the Collector (Appeals) who had upheld the order of confiscation of the goods in the inventory list at Sl. Nos. 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 20 and 32. The remaining goods were revalued at Rs. 1,38....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the appellant's relative and the appellant was out of station and as such the defects could not be removed earlier. He has pleaded that since the original appeal in the form of letter was in time the submission of appeal was also in time. If at all there is any delay the same may kindly be condoned. On merits, the learned Advocate has argued that the goods brought by the appellant are for the use....