1983 (7) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Central Board of Excise and Customs dated 25-8-1982 in No. 270. The appeal has been adjourned on two occasions at the instance of the respondent herein and when the appeal was called out today, neither the respondent nor any authorised representative on their behalf was present. The appeal is therefore disposed on merits. 2.  The respondent exported a consignment of grinders and drilling ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 12 notwithstanding the fact that electric motor only formed a component part of grinder/drilling machine which the respondent admittedly exported. The Collector has preferred an appeal against the order of the Board before the Tribunal. 3.  The question that arises for consideration in this case is whether the notification issued under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 would apply t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as may be specified in the notification. The respondent-company have admittedly exported grinders and drilling machines only and merely because electric motor formed a component part of grinder/drilling machine or fitted thereto, "electric motors or parts" could not be said to have been exported outside India within the meaning of Rule 12 read with the relevant notification. In other words, in the....