Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (12) TMI 231

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. United Export Corporation preferred two appeals before the Appellate Collector of Customs. The Appellate Collector by his common order bearing S/49-311 & 312/79-L, dated 6-10-80 rejected the appeals. Thereafter, M/s. United Export Corporation preferred one Revision Application before the Government of India which statutorily stood transferred to the Tribunal for being heard as an appeal. 2. When that Revision Application came up for consideration, it was pointed out to the appellants that since there were two appeals before the Appellate Collector, there should have been two Revision Applications and the appellants were given an option either to restrict the Revision Application only to any one of the appeals filed before the App....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd Rs. 24,000/- in respect of another consignment. On appeal, the Appellate Collector rejected both the appeals and confirmed the orders of the Deputy Collector. 5. During the hearing of these appeals, Shri J.M. Jamadar, Advocate, made the following submissions : (1)       That the stamping foils imported by the appellants do not appear in column 2 of Annexure II and therefore it cannot be considered as export-linked-import item and as such it is not hit by the restriction of import list under Sub-para (c) of Para 30(1) Section I, Part B for A.M. 1978 Policy. (2)    The type of stamping foils imported by the appellants are used in plastic industry only and they are not required in the re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nly items specified against their export item and items specified are at Serial No. 2 & 14 of Annexure II. Serial No. 2 & 14 of Annexure II do not contain stamping foils. Shri Pal further submitted that the expression "trimming" and "embellishment" are generic terms and stamping foils would fall within the said expressions and, therefore, the stamping foils could be imported by exporters of '0' group only and not 'C' group. Finally, Shri Pal submitted that the issue involved in these appeals, is already covered by the decisions of this Bench, namely orders bearing No. 271 - 272/86 WRB, dated 12-2-86 and order No. 1469/86, dated 6-12-85. 7. In his reply, Shri Jamadar contended that Annexure II only provides for restriction as to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....licence to the licensing authority concerned through D.G.T.D., New Delhi (E.P. Directorate), giving full justification." 10. From the reading of Clause (c) of Para 30(1), it is clear the import of items appearing in the list in Annexure II is allowed against export of the product indicated against the import item. 11. Annexure II is found in Part B. It has four columns. Column 1 is serial number, column 2 specify the items eligible for import, column 3 gives description of export products against which import will be allowed and column 4 is meant for remarks. Serial number (2) of Annexure II reads : "Acrylic plastic sheets, off-cuts, tubes/rods". The export products indicated against this item are : (i) Plastic Bang....