Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1986 (5) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)]. - On hearing both sides, we observe that the appellants received the impugned order on 9-9-1985. As per the postal receipt, their appeal was received in the Registry on 9-12-1985, i.e. within the prescribed period of three months. The appeal being in time, the application for condonation of delay is infructuous and is dismissed a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re the required special quality fabrics in lots of minimum twenty thousand meters. But these customers buy only a small quantity at a time. The rest of the quantity keeps lying in the appellants' factory. The appellants realise interest charges for holding the stock from such customers. The appellants were recovering special checking charges and interest from the respective customers under the lab....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in the particular sort/quality manufactured for the respective industrial customer. Therefore, there is no question of the price charged for that special sort/quality being an exceptional price. This is so for the simple reason that there is no other normal price for that sort/quality. 4. Secondly, the holding charges for the stock held by the appellants in their factory store-room are nothing ....