Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1977 (12) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come from M/s. Namkum Transport Co. and M/s. Shivchand Joshi & Co. and from house property. The assessee paid Rs. 3,768 to Shri Dinesh Mehta who looked after her interest in the above two firms and claimed the deduction for Rs. 3,768. The ITO disallowed the claim of the assessee observing that no details have been filed. On appeal, the counsel of the assessee contended that the payment of Rs. 3,76....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the counsel of the assessee, relying in 74 I.T.R 57 SC urged that Shri Metha was looking after the interest of the assessee in the two firms, and therefore, the payment of salary to Shri Mehta was the business expenditure. The Departmental Representative very strongly relied on the orders of the authorities below and urged that the assessee should have looked after her interest in the two firms an....