Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1982 (1) TMI 101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Deshi Khand, inter alia. Whereas the assessee valued the closing stock of Deshi Khand @ Rs. 300 per quintal, the ITO valued the same at the rate of Rs. 400 per quintal. This is how, an addition of Rs. 9,000 was made and penalty proceedings were initiated for having furnished inaccurate particulars of income, as the closing stock of Deshi Khand was purportedly under-valued by the assessee. The as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to Rs. 435. There was no sale in the month of January. The sale rates constantly have gone down in the month of February and March. The submission of the assessee is that considering the fluctuations of the sale rates, the closing stock of Deshi Khand had been valued @ Rs. 300 per quintal. The submission of Shri Singhal is that the assessee may be wrong in valuing the closing stock on the rate as ....