Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1981 (7) TMI 124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct r/w s. 10(4A) of the IT Act in respect of deposit of Rs. 2,02,795. Admittedly the assessee deposited Rs. 2,02,795 under non-resident (External Account). This deposit was received under the foreign remittance scheme. The WTO accepted the return of net wealth in which the assessee had failed to claim the above exemption. The AAC declined to interfere as the assessee had not claimed the exemption ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. Gurjargravures P. Ltd. 1978 CTR (SC) 1 : (1978) 111 ITR 1 (SC) and submitted that the assessee can not agitate this point. 3. We find that the decision of the Supreme Court referred to above is not applicable in the assessee's case. In the first instance all the material facts were there already and the WTO should have considered the matter correctly. Secondly, the AAC was also not right in ....