Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1982 (9) TMI 128

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessment year concerned. Financial year is the previous year. Assessee is a firm. On the application for registration, the ITO refused to grant registration. Assessment was completed by the ITO as per order dt. 29th Nov., 1978 determining total income at Rs. 49,950 as rounded off, as against declared income of Rs. 38,140. It was a best judgement assessment. Assessment came to be completed under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with a direction to the ITO to reframe the assessment after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee firm. 4. Revenue is aggrieved from aforesaid finding. Learned departmental representative submitted that in addition to going in appeal against the best judgement assessment, assessee firm had also moved before the ITO an application under s. 146 for cancellation of the said assessment a....