1984 (6) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2-83. 2. According to the facts of this case, the assessee was dealing in the business of manufacturing of rice and sale thereof. Before the ITO, the assessee claimed relief under s. 32A. The plea of the assessee was not accepted by the ITO on the ground that the higher authorities have treated the rice mill as a non-manufacturing concern and keeping in view the finding given by the higher auth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reat the assessee as industrial undertaking and allow relief under s. 32A as per provision of law. 4. Not satisfied with the order passed by the AAC, the Department is in appeal before us. Before us, the ld. departmental representative submitted that the AAC erred in holding that the rice mill is an industrial undertaking when the manufacturing of goods does not exist in a rice mill. It was fur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he AAC was of the view that the finished product is not identical with the raw material. Sec. 32A(2) (ii) requires that the machinery or plant should be used in the business in construction, manufacture and production of any one or more articles or things specified in the 9th Schedule and (111) in a small scale industrial undertaking for the purpose of business of manufacturing or production of an....