1998 (4) TMI 155

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ey, for the asst. yr. 1990-91. The only ground raised by the Revenue in this appeal is that the CIT(A) erred in holding that deduction under s. 80HHC is allowed on the profits from tea before the apportionment as per r. 8 of the IT Rules. 2. The assessee is a company in which the public are substantially interested and it derives income from the manufacture of tea from own estates and also from t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he entire profit from tea and then 40 per cent of the balance amount was to be apportioned as income liable to tax under Central Income-tax. The Department is in appeal before the Tribunal with the plea that the deduction allowed by the CIT(A) is not in order. 3. We have heard the Departmental Representative Shri Kuruvilla M. George, and the assessee's representative Shri R. Sekar, Chartered Acco....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... deduction in respect of the profits from the industry contemplated under s. 80-I of the IT Act, 1961, should be applied to the profits and gains attributable to the income from the tea industry before r. 8 of the IT Rules, 1962 is applied to apportion the agricultural income chargeable to agricultural income-tax." Rule 8(1) of the IT Rules provides that income derived from the sale of tea, grown....