<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 292 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) that the capital gain from the sale of shares by the assessee&#039;s minor son should be assessed in the hands of the assessee, allowing a rebate under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the minor child should be treated as an &#039;assessee&#039; for the purpose of Sections 45(1) and 54F, ensuring fair and logical income computation. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 292 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) that the capital gain from the sale of shares by the assessee&#039;s minor son should be assessed in the hands of the assessee, allowing a rebate under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the minor child should be treated as an &#039;assessee&#039; for the purpose of Sections 45(1) and 54F, ensuring fair and logical income computation. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>