<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 202 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that charging interest under sections 139(8) and 215 is mandatory. The failure to charge interest constitutes a rectifiable mistake of law. The Tribunal held that the rectification order was timely, as the limitation period starts from the date of the order containing the mistake, not the original assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 202 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that charging interest under sections 139(8) and 215 is mandatory. The failure to charge interest constitutes a rectifiable mistake of law. The Tribunal held that the rectification order was timely, as the limitation period starts from the date of the order containing the mistake, not the original assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>