<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 271 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the second notice under section 148 issued on 18-11-1997 was invalid as the first notice issued on 7-3-1991 remained pending and had not been disposed of. Consequently, the assessment order passed on 31st December, 1999, pursuant to the second notice, was quashed. The appeal was treated as allowed, and it was held that successive proceedings under section 148 could not be initiated without completing the earlier ones.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:49:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 271 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the second notice under section 148 issued on 18-11-1997 was invalid as the first notice issued on 7-3-1991 remained pending and had not been disposed of. Consequently, the assessment order passed on 31st December, 1999, pursuant to the second notice, was quashed. The appeal was treated as allowed, and it was held that successive proceedings under section 148 could not be initiated without completing the earlier ones.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>