<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 173 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61514</link>
    <description>The appeals in the cases of S/Shri Rajinder Gupta for the assessment year 1992-93, Nohar Chand Gupta, Varinder Gupta, and Smt. Madhu Gupta were allowed as interest-free loans were not considered a benefit or perquisite under section 2(24)(iv). The appeal in the case of Rajinder Gupta for the assessment year 1996-97 was partly allowed with a direction to recompute the perquisite value of free electricity based on the correct definition of salary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 173 - ITAT CHANDIGARH-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61514</link>
      <description>The appeals in the cases of S/Shri Rajinder Gupta for the assessment year 1992-93, Nohar Chand Gupta, Varinder Gupta, and Smt. Madhu Gupta were allowed as interest-free loans were not considered a benefit or perquisite under section 2(24)(iv). The appeal in the case of Rajinder Gupta for the assessment year 1996-97 was partly allowed with a direction to recompute the perquisite value of free electricity based on the correct definition of salary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>