<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 177 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the cancellation of the penalty under s. 271(1)(c) for claiming bogus purchases due to the inordinate delay in filing the appeal and the lack of sufficient grounds for condonation. The case underscores the importance of timely appeals, proper explanations for delays, and adherence to Tribunal directives for further actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 177 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the cancellation of the penalty under s. 271(1)(c) for claiming bogus purchases due to the inordinate delay in filing the appeal and the lack of sufficient grounds for condonation. The case underscores the importance of timely appeals, proper explanations for delays, and adherence to Tribunal directives for further actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>