<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 237 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, finding that the notices issued under s. 148 were time-barred and therefore invalid. Consequently, the reassessments and penalties based on those notices were quashed, leading to the allowance of the appeals by the assessees. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the assessment proceedings were without jurisdiction due to the time-barred notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 237 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, finding that the notices issued under s. 148 were time-barred and therefore invalid. Consequently, the reassessments and penalties based on those notices were quashed, leading to the allowance of the appeals by the assessees. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that the assessment proceedings were without jurisdiction due to the time-barred notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>